Papercuts remixed (was Re: What's the status of papercuts?)

BAUVENS Laurent laurent.bauvens at cnamts.fr
Thu Jul 12 17:07:24 UTC 2012


Humm FYI, vote-for-fix and pay-for-fix systems could be worked
essentially for individuals but certainly not for businesses and public
organizations which have a strict accounting process. Moreover these
systems tend to over represent individual needs because one professional
TB admin can represent hundreds and even sometimes dozens of thousands
users.

AFAIK, in term of number of users, Thunderbird has about 20 million
users and some Mozilla sources say only 7 or 8 millions are individual
users. So I guess the 12 other millions represent the professional users.

Le 12/07/2012 11:48, Tanstaafl a écrit :
> On 2012-07-11 6:41 PM, Axel <axel.grude at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> My term "vouching" was meant to represent the process of selecting
>>> which bugs you think need fixing, and adding your "voucher" to some
>>> number of those. I meant it as a plural term for the noun "vote".
>
>> exactly, shouldn't the bug votes somehow be accounted for when
>> prioritizing them? guess we will need some sort of committee to decide
>> which bugs are really important.
>
> If Thunderbird is going to become more community driven/oriented, then
> indeed votes should count more... they shouldn't be the only factor,
> but they should definitely matter. The problem is the flip side -
> since the development is community driven/volunteer, there is no way
> (nor should there be) to force any developer to work on any given bug...
>
> This is another reason why I am in favor of some kind of bounty
> system. It is a way for 'voters' to put their money where their mouth
> is - and, it is a simple and meaningful way for the devs/maintainers
> to deflect criticism of bugs not getting fixed - ie, "you want it
> fixed? put up or shut up! <link to bounty system>". Also, if such a
> system is put in place, there needs to be a way to identify pledgers,
> so if they don't follow through on their pledges, this fact should be
> publicized prominently (to hopefully shame them into making good on
> it), as well as to be able to show public appreciation once they do.

-- 
Laurent BAUVENS

Citation du jour :
> Loi Zéro : Un robot ne peut nuire à l'humanité ni, restant passif, 
> permettre que l'humanité souffre d'un mal. - Isaac Asimov






*****************************************************
"Le contenu de ce courriel et ses eventuelles pièces jointes sont confidentiels. Ils s'adressent exclusivement à la personne destinataire. Si cet envoi ne vous est pas destiné, ou si vous l'avez reçu par erreur, et afin de ne pas violer le secret des correspondances, vous ne devez pas le transmettre à d'autres personnes ni le reproduire. Merci de le renvoyer à l'émetteur et de le détruire.

Attention : L'Organisme de l'émetteur du message ne pourra être tenu responsable de l'altération du présent courriel. Il appartient au destinataire de vérifier que les messages et pièces jointes reçus ne contiennent pas de virus. Les opinions contenues dans ce courriel et ses éventuelles pièces jointes sont celles de l'émetteur. Elles ne reflètent pas la position de l'Organisme sauf s'il en est disposé autrement dans le présent courriel."
******************************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/tb-planning/attachments/20120712/667dcff2/attachment.html>


More information about the tb-planning mailing list