Papercuts remixed (was Re: What's the status of papercuts?)

Mike Conley mconley at
Wed Jul 11 13:52:41 UTC 2012

I'm on board with this.

The UX-Prio stuff was what I started focusing on after Filelink and 
Account Provisioner were released - however, hiccups and developments in 
both of those features have continued to distract me from the list.

Anyhow, I agree with rkent - I think this could be an excellent way to 
communicate that we're serious about making Thunderbird better / faster/ 
stronger in this "post innovation driven by Mozilla" phase that we're 


On 11/07/2012 9:26 AM, Ludovic Hirlimann wrote:
> On 7/11/12 3:23 PM, Kent James wrote:
>> On 7/11/2012 5:25 AM, Ludovic Hirlimann wrote:
>>> On 7/11/12 2:14 PM, Kent James wrote:
>>>> The benevolent dictator is necessary because there might be some
>>>> rework bugs that need to be on the list, and there might be some
>>>> popular bugs that require too much rework to be practical.
>>> I agree on that - previous project I was involved with worked because
>>> of a strong leader (or dictator). We need to agree on who's going to
>>> be that person. Ideas on who should do that ?
>> I think it is too early to be very concrete about that - ideally it
>> would be a group. The main thing that I wanted to do was to dispel the
>> idea that votes are the only criteria.
> And I completely agree with that. It wasn't even part of my criteria :-)
> Ludo
> _______________________________________________
> tb-planning mailing list
> tb-planning at

More information about the tb-planning mailing list