Status of the "Compose in a tab" experiment
jonathan.protzenko at gmail.com
Tue Apr 5 20:11:14 UTC 2011
My point is many people are more proficient with HTML than with XUL.
Andy Chung, for instance, does nothing but HTML designs. And he's using
-moz-box-flex, which *is* the XUL box model. What's left that XUL has
and HTML hasn't? <xul:description crop="end"> to emulate text-overflow:
ellipsis that gecko *still* hasn't implemented. What else? Menus, but
these will come somehow with HTML5. A few native widgets...
There's little fresh blood coming to the Thunderbird world. I don't
think we can afford to be picky. Anyone who's talented with HTML could
be help on this project, imho :-).
On Tue 05 Apr 2011 10:05:17 PM CEST, Ben Bucksch wrote:
> On 05.04.2011 21:52, Jim wrote:
>> had become pretty proficient in HTML/JS. Coming
>> into Thunderbird, I had essentially no experience writing XUL and was
>> only vaguely aware that it existed. However, I found using XUL to be
>> much less painful for the various UX enhancements I've worked on,
>> since many of the things that I'd have to rely on tricks in HTML just
>> "work" in XUL. If nothing else,<spacer> and the flex attribute have
>> been godsends for me.
> Matches my experience. Trying to do UIs in HTML has been "infuriating"
> for me.
> tb-planning mailing list
> tb-planning at mozilla.org
More information about the tb-planning