code name for Thunderbird 3.2

Chelsea Novak chelsea at mozillafoundation.org
Fri Jun 25 14:08:56 UTC 2010


  Hey Dan,

Thanks so much for getting this decided. I fully agree, the next beach 
should be outside of North America. I'll work on a longer list of places 
around the world for the Thunderbird team to choose from for 3.3.

Thanks again!

Cheers,
Chelsea

On 24/06/10 5:01 PM, Dan Mosedale wrote:
>  On 6/18/10 4:01 PM, Dan Mosedale wrote:
>> Thunderbird 3.1 was code-named Lanikai, after a beach in Hawaii, and 
>> the Mozilla Foundation is running a campaign to help people donate to 
>> help stabilize an endangered species of bird there at 
>> <http://www.mozilla.org/parks/lanikai/>.
>>
>> We'd like to do something similar for Thunderbird 3.2, and have been 
>> talking to the Mozilla Foundation about our options.  They mentioned 
>> that a lot of folks have been asking if there's some way for Mozilla 
>> to help channel charitable donations to help clean up after the oil 
>> spill in the Gulf of Mexico, and suggested that naming the release 
>> after Miramar beach in Florida would be a good way to do this.
>>
>> To quote:
>>> [Miramar] is on the gulf coast. It's on the edge of the spill zone, 
>>> but not largely effected yet, nor is it one of the truly devastated 
>>> areas. It is a vacation destination in the gulf and the name isn't 
>>> directly correlated to the spill (so it doesn't immediately make one 
>>> think of the disaster when they hear the name). The thinking with 
>>> choosing this beach is that we could use the name (easy to say in 
>>> English) for 3.2, but fundraise for clean up efforts for the entire 
>>> gulf.
>> I like this thinking, as it strikes me that it does a good job of 
>> balancing naming concerns while still helping us Do the Right Thing 
>> by fundraising for the gulf.
> First off, thanks to everyone for the feedback on using Miramar as a 
> code name.  A number of good points were brought up (particularly 
> around known impact of donations & Amero-centricity).   In the 
> interest of not spending a lot of time on things like code-naming that 
> we could be spending on the product itself, I'm very much inclined to 
> bias away from "perfect" and towards "good enough".  All things 
> considered, I think that, Miramar is a fine code name, and so we're 
> going to use that for 3.2.
>
> We will continue to get more chances to pick code names in the future, 
> and we'll try to take the feedback given this time into account as we 
> do that.  In particular, I'll commit to making the next code name not 
> be in North America at all...
>
> Dan

-- 
Chelsea Novak
Engagement and Fundraising Manager
Mozilla Foundation
chelsea at mozillafoundation.org
mozilla.org




More information about the tb-planning mailing list