Adopting the mozilla-central superreview policy in comm-central

David Bienvenu bienvenu at
Thu Jun 10 19:40:51 UTC 2010

  On 6/10/2010 12:32 PM, Kent James wrote:
>  What does this actually mean in practice?
> Previously, I interpreted the policy (perhaps incorrectly) that all /mailnews needed sr and all /mail did not.
No, that's correct.
> As I understand the change, you are saying that neither /mailnews nor /mail will require sr, but sr will be added when the complexity tests of the new review process is 
> met. So this would result in more sr in /mail, and less in /mailnews.
> Is that roughly correct?
Roughly, yes, though mail doesn't have a lot of interfaces to change, and other than asuth's, doesn't tend to have big sweeping changes performed on it.

- David

More information about the tb-planning mailing list