NNTP and thunderbird-related lists

Ben Bucksch ben.bucksch at beonex.com
Mon Aug 2 16:55:00 UTC 2010

  On 31.07.2010 21:02, Robert Kaiser wrote:
>> In general, current Thunderbird thinking is that we try to "design the
>> experience to help the user solve a problem and abstract away the
>> transport layer".
> Maybe that's one of the reasons why I tend to have a large problem...
> It looks like we have a case of somewhat radically different views on 
> the same subject here

To his defense, that has always been the philosophy of Netscape, Mozilla 
and Mailnews. Very explicitly and intentionally so. It's not specific to 

ftp in Netscape Navigator is browsed just like a webpage, you don't use 
a shell-like "ls" UI. That seems natural today, but it's not a matter of 
course, it was an invention back then, and it helped lots of users.

Similarly, the fact that we show NTTP and POP and IMAP all in the same 
3pane UI seems natural today, but is an instance of the very same design 

I don't think we should design the UI around the protocol. Whether it's 
NTTP or IMAP or webforum doesn't matter. But the UI should indeed single 
out certain criteria that you mentioned: one-to-one vs. one-to-many vs. 
many-to-many are different kinds of communications, have subtle 
implications like importance and should be handled slightly differently.

> But here we surely grow very much off-topic on the current discussion

Indeed. I just wanted to point this out.

More information about the tb-planning mailing list