do our tinderboxen all run at 1280x1024?

Ludovic Hirlimann ludovic at mozillamessaging.com
Tue Apr 27 04:49:17 UTC 2010


 On 26/04/10 23:28, Ben Bucksch wrote:
>  On 26.04.2010 21:33, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
>> On 64-07-22 14:59 , Andrew Sutherland wrote:
>>>   The comm-1.9.2 windows unit test tinderbox was failing on a mozmill
>>> test and it appears the reason is that it was not running at the
>>> reference platform resolution of 1280x1024
>>> https://wiki.mozilla.org/ReferencePlatforms/Win32
>>> [...]
>> every win32 build box had a slightly different resolution.
>> I am now fixing them all back to 1280x1024
>
> Isn't it a good thing that they run at different resolutions? If
> something breaks with a resolution != 1280x1024, we'd want to know
> that, no?
>
For that to work, you would need to know which machines are running at
what resolution and for some test figure it out before launching the tests.


Ludovic

-- 
Ludovic Hirlimann MozillaMessaging QA lead  
http://flic.kr/photos/lhirlimann
http://www.spreadthunderbird.com/aff/79/2


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 259 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/tb-planning/attachments/20100427/804dd471/attachment.sig>


More information about the tb-planning mailing list