[proposal] X-Client-State header for Sync relaunch

Chris Karlof ckarlof at mozilla.com
Tue Jan 28 12:11:05 PST 2014

On Jan 27, 2014, at 12:29 PM, Nick Alexander <nalexander at mozilla.com> wrote:

> On 1/27/2014, 12:24 PM, Brian Warner wrote:
>> On Jan 27, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Richard Newman <rnewman at mozilla.com> wrote:
>>> As such, I would imagine that truncation here is fine, no? We're not really worried about collisions.
>> Truncating a good cryptographic hash function is safe, as long as you're still happy with the remaining length. 16 bytes is enough to avoid accidental collisions until we get to like 2^64 users, at which point we'll have bigger problems to worry about, like the storage servers collapsing into a black hole.
>>>> * We don't want to give an oracle to testing kB, but we pretty much have to in order for clients to get the comparison they need.  We're not going to do a zero-knowledge proof here.
>> kB is full-size and random. Yeah, an oracle lets someone do offline guesses, but they'll need 2^256-ish guesses to succeed. So no worries there either.
> OK, based on warner's input I suggest we go with the much simpler

+1, let's do it.


> If I read what warner says correctly, the key-space for kB is large enough that we don't need to salt with the email address.  This makes life a good deal simpler for clients.
> Comments?
> Nick
> _______________________________________________
> Sync-dev mailing list
> Sync-dev at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev

More information about the Sync-dev mailing list