[rust-dev] Integer overflow, round -2147483648

Daniel Micay danielmicay at gmail.com
Tue Jun 24 12:01:17 PDT 2014


On 24/06/14 02:34 PM, Daniel Micay wrote:
> 
> You haven't explained how this is going to cause security issues in
> Rust, when the language is guaranteed to be memory safe outside of
> `unsafe` blocks. The `unsafe` blocks are low-level, performance critical
> code where unnecessary overflow checks are always going to be
> acceptable, so the feature has next to no value in terms of memory safety.

s/acceptable/unacceptable/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/attachments/20140624/dba1950e/attachment.sig>


More information about the Rust-dev mailing list