[rust-dev] Integer overflow, round -2147483648
danielmicay at gmail.com
Tue Jun 24 12:01:17 PDT 2014
On 24/06/14 02:34 PM, Daniel Micay wrote:
> You haven't explained how this is going to cause security issues in
> Rust, when the language is guaranteed to be memory safe outside of
> `unsafe` blocks. The `unsafe` blocks are low-level, performance critical
> code where unnecessary overflow checks are always going to be
> acceptable, so the feature has next to no value in terms of memory safety.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Rust-dev