[rust-dev] Integer overflow, round -2147483648

Benjamin Striegel ben.striegel at gmail.com
Sun Jun 22 09:21:16 PDT 2014

I apologize for being hostile. As Florian has noted, we're just arguing
about the default behavior here. It is my opinion that checked behavior by
default will make Rust unsuitable for filling C++'s niche, and send the
message that we are not serious about performance.

On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Evan G <eg1290 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't think I was ever "Railing against the incorrectness of overflow
> semantics"? I was just pointing out that your (imo pretty hostile?) message
> about "If you don't require absolute speed, why are you using Rust?"
> doesn't really ring true. Most C++ programmers don't even require absolute
> speed.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/attachments/20140622/bf23ec39/attachment.html>

More information about the Rust-dev mailing list