[rust-dev] Integer overflow, round -2147483648

Evan G eg1290 at gmail.com
Sun Jun 22 09:10:35 PDT 2014

I don't think I was ever "Railing against the incorrectness of overflow
semantics"? I was just pointing out that your (imo pretty hostile?) message
about "If you don't require absolute speed, why are you using Rust?"
doesn't really ring true. Most C++ programmers don't even require absolute
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/attachments/20140622/11199a7a/attachment.html>

More information about the Rust-dev mailing list