[rust-dev] Fwd: &self/&mut self in traits considered harmful(?)
rusty.gates at icloud.com
Tue Jun 17 04:43:53 PDT 2014
As it stands, the documentation doesn't say that `Mul` means commutative multiplication. Therefore it would be a mistake to write generic code that assumes that a type which implements `Mul` has commutative multiplication. Implementing `Mul` for two matrices would not be a mistake.
On 2014-06-17, at 14:34, SiegeLord <slabode at aim.com> wrote:
> On 06/16/2014 06:17 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote:
>> On Jun 16, 2014, at 3:03 PM, Cameron Zwarich <zwarich at mozilla.com> wrote:
>> I stated the right case, but the wrong reason. It’s not for vectorization, it’s because it’s not easy to reuse the storage of a matrix while multiplying into it.
> Overloading Mul for matrix multiplication would be a mistake, since that operator does not act the same way multiplication acts for scalars. I.e. you'd overload it, but passing two matrices into a generic function could do very unexpected things if the code, e.g., relies on the operation being commutative. Additionally, if your matrices contain the size in their type, then some generic code wouldn't even accept them. Matrix scalar multiplication is a better candidate for the Mul overload.
> Rust-dev mailing list
> Rust-dev at mozilla.org
More information about the Rust-dev