[rust-dev] std::num::pow() is inadequate / language concepts

Tommy M. McGuire mcguire at crsr.net
Thu Jul 24 16:21:23 PDT 2014

On 07/24/2014 05:55 PM, Huon Wilson wrote:
> 1.0 will not stabilise every function in every library; we have precise
> stability attributes[1] so that the compiler can warn or error if you
> are using functionality that is subject to change. The goal is to have
> the entirety of the standard library classified and marked appropriately
> for 1.0.
> [1]: http://doc.rust-lang.org/master/rust.html#stability

How would that solve the general problem? What would the stability of
pow() be if Gregor had not brought up the issue now?

Tommy M. McGuire
mcguire at crsr.net

More information about the Rust-dev mailing list