[rust-dev] [ANN] zmq.rs - native stack of ØMQ in Rus

Corey Richardson corey at octayn.net
Wed Jul 2 13:55:04 PDT 2014


See also the discussion on IRC:
https://botbot.me/mozilla/rust/2014-07-02/?msg=17359232&page=22

It wasn't my intention to discourage using any particular license, but
to raise its requirements if they weren't consciously chosen.

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:33 PM, SiegeLordEx <slabode at aim.com> wrote:
> On 07/02/2014 03:16 AM, Corey Richardson wrote:
>>
>> Complaining about something I don't like:
>>
>> Due to the choice of MPLv2, this won't be usable in the wider Rust
>> ecosystem, which is MIT/ASL2 focused. In particular, section 3.2(a)
>> requires that any distribution in "Executable Form" carry a notice
>> about how to acquire the source code of zmq.rs. This is not
>> unworkable, but it is something we have avoided so far in the
>> community.
>
>
> I should note that this is not a universally held opinion in the Rust
> community. While it is true that many/most current Rust projects mimic the
> license of `rustc` itself, there's nothing in Rust as a language that
> precludes or encourages the use of any particular license. The mentioned
> 'avoidance' is likely a consequence of the people just preferring those
> licenses (i.e. they'd use them for their non-Rust projects as well) rather
> than Rust being against the spirit of attribution, share-alike, copyleft etc
> per se.
>
> Personally, I would encourage Free Rust software just like I would encourage
> it in any other language. You shouldn't feel like you need to compromise on
> your moral principles (or whatever else you consult when choosing a license)
> to contribute to Rust's success.
>
> -SL
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rust-dev mailing list
> Rust-dev at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev



-- 
http://octayn.net/


More information about the Rust-dev mailing list