[rust-dev] RFC: New Rust channel proposal

Jason Fager jfager at gmail.com
Thu Jan 23 20:07:04 PST 2014


Also, +1 for source and sink, I still get port and channel mixed up.

On Thursday, January 23, 2014, Jason Fager <jfager at gmail.com> wrote:

> open() feels like the clear winner here.  Channel::new_pipe is annoying
> because it's long and because channels and pipes are different things (
> http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pipe_flow),
>
> And aren't we down to naming? I thought the design sounded mostly settled
> from the last conversation, and brson revived the thread specifically
> responding to a question about naming.
>
>
>
> On Thursday, January 23, 2014, Tony Arcieri <bascule at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Benjamin Striegel <
>> ben.striegel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> And Chan::open() doesn't map to anything that's as intuitive.
>>>
>>
>> Like File::open? :P
>>
>> --
>> Tony Arcieri
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/attachments/20140123/f56ffdfe/attachment.html>


More information about the Rust-dev mailing list