[rust-dev] RFC: New Rust channel proposal
jfager at gmail.com
Thu Jan 23 20:07:04 PST 2014
Also, +1 for source and sink, I still get port and channel mixed up.
On Thursday, January 23, 2014, Jason Fager <jfager at gmail.com> wrote:
> open() feels like the clear winner here. Channel::new_pipe is annoying
> because it's long and because channels and pipes are different things (
> And aren't we down to naming? I thought the design sounded mostly settled
> from the last conversation, and brson revived the thread specifically
> responding to a question about naming.
> On Thursday, January 23, 2014, Tony Arcieri <bascule at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Benjamin Striegel <
>> ben.striegel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> And Chan::open() doesn't map to anything that's as intuitive.
>> Like File::open? :P
>> Tony Arcieri
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Rust-dev