[rust-dev] RFC: New Rust channel proposal

Jason Fager jfager at gmail.com
Thu Jan 23 20:00:16 PST 2014


open() feels like the clear winner here.  Channel::new_pipe is annoying
because it's long and because channels and pipes are different things (
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pipe_flow),

And aren't we down to naming? I thought the design sounded mostly settled
from the last conversation, and brson revived the thread specifically
responding to a question about naming.



On Thursday, January 23, 2014, Tony Arcieri <bascule at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Benjamin Striegel <ben.striegel at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> And Chan::open() doesn't map to anything that's as intuitive.
>>
>
> Like File::open? :P
>
> --
> Tony Arcieri
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/attachments/20140123/9c8b9240/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Rust-dev mailing list