[rust-dev] RFC: Future of the Build System

Jan Niklas Hasse jhasse at gmail.com
Tue Jan 14 14:31:00 PST 2014

Am 14.01.2014 23:11, schrieb Lee Braiden:
> On 14/01/14 20:51, George Makrydakis wrote:
>> That would be a good start. But are you advocating that it should be 
>> third party tools thatcshould be given guidelines on how to comply? 
>> What would be their incentive to do so? Or should this be used as a 
>> basis for creating a prototype deploying duch information... which 
>> would inevitably ask again:
>> Should Rust have its own build tool, given your proposal of 
>> standardized representational information ? Dealing with such 
>> metadata forces you to design a new system.
> I guess I'm saying that, no matter what solution you choose:
> a) People will want their own version, either because they know and 
> prefer something else, OR just because they run, say, debian, and it 
> manages 26000 packages on their system, and they want Rust to be 
> managed that way too.**

I don't understand what debian's package manager has to do with a build 

There's no reason why

apt-get install librust-sdl2-dev

shouldn't work, no matter what rust-sdl2 uses for building itself. The 
package will just contain a rlib file and put it inside 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/attachments/20140114/1fbc02f1/attachment.html>

More information about the Rust-dev mailing list