[rust-dev] Automatic Clone Derivation Proposal

Huon Wilson dbau.pp at gmail.com
Thu Jul 18 17:26:44 PDT 2013

On 19/07/13 05:39, Corey Richardson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Daniel Micay <danielmicay at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Plenty of types can't actually be ordered, and in *many* cases not all
>> fields should be considered for equality/ordering and they may or may
>> not be listed in the order the comparison should try.
> I've wanted like #[deriving(Ord(a, b), Eq(b, c))] which would define
> not only which fields are used for comparison but also the order of
> the fields for... ordering.
> _______________________________________________
> Rust-dev mailing list
> Rust-dev at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev

I'm working on this; at the moment the plan is to look something like:

struct A { x: int, y: int, z: int, w: int, t: int }
// is the same as
impl Ord for A {
fn lt(&self, other: &A) -> bool {
self.z < other.z &&
         other.y < self.y &&
     self.x < other.x &&
             self.t  < other.t
// etc.

The reason `test_order` and `ignore` are separated is because I imagine
the most common cases are ignoring one field, and moving one field to be
tested first, and so these would be #[deriving(Ord(ignore(field)))] and
#[deriving(Ord(test_order(field)))] respectively, rather than having
to list all the fields explicitly. (I'm willing to be convinced

It will work with `Eq`, `TotalEq` and `TotalOrd` too; and for each trait
the appropriate options (i.e. `ignore` for the Total traits, and `reverse`
for the Eq ones) will be disabled with an error.


More information about the Rust-dev mailing list