[rust-dev] Fall-through in alt, break&continue by label

Patrick Walton pwalton at mozilla.com
Mon Apr 16 11:49:47 PDT 2012

On 4/16/12 11:46 AM, Graydon Hoare wrote:
> They're already "present" (were from the beginning) but they broke when
> we shifted from rustboot (hand-rolled code generator) to rustc (LLVM).
> It turns out that you have to adopt a somewhat pessimistic ABI in all
> cases if your functions are to be tail-callable. There's a bug open on
> this[1] that discusses in some more detail, but I think the feature is
> drifting towards a decision to remove the feature altogether.

I actually disagree with this; I think that we should measure. I'm not 
sure that the Pascal calling convention is worse than the C calling 
convention in practice.

In any case, I believe we're doing sibling call optimization already.


More information about the Rust-dev mailing list