[rust-dev] Shapiro: BitC isn't going to work

Benjamin Striegel ben.striegel at gmail.com
Mon Apr 9 07:02:23 PDT 2012

Here's Jonathan Shapiro's followup where he talks specifically about


I'm interested to know if any of the specific issues he raises (multiple
instantiation, operator overloading, a desire to emulate inheritance) apply
to Rust.

On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Patrick Walton <pwalton at mozilla.com> wrote:

> On 03/24/2012 01:57 PM, Sebastian Sylvan wrote:
>> Here's a note by Jonathan Shapiro saying that BitC is no longer going
>> to work: http://www.coyotos.org/**pipermail/bitc-dev/2012-March/**
>> 003300.html<http://www.coyotos.org/pipermail/bitc-dev/2012-March/003300.html>
>> It had many of the same goals as Rust, so it may be interesting to
>> this mailing list to learn from BitC.
> Very interesting. I posted my thoughts on Hacker News (along with some
> comparisons to Go):
> http://news.ycombinator.com/**item?id=3750882<http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3750882>
> Patrick
> ______________________________**_________________
> Rust-dev mailing list
> Rust-dev at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/**listinfo/rust-dev<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/attachments/20120409/ff49f9b5/attachment.html>

More information about the Rust-dev mailing list