[rust-dev] Interface / typeclass proposal
marijnh at gmail.com
Thu Dec 1 00:15:22 PST 2011
> Do you feel (straw-vote) like you'd be sufficiently happy to be able to
> override the former group but not the latter?
> (Also: please say you've no interest in permitting user-defined
> operator-symbols with their own associativity and precedence. Right?)
This is from my xmonad config:
composeOne [ isDialog -?> manageHook defaultConfig,
isKDETrayWindow -?> manageHook defaultConfig,
return True -?> insertPosition End
Newer <+> manageHook defaultConfig ]
It seems to work, but I still don't really understand what it says.
Let's not go there in Rust.
More information about the Rust-dev