<div dir="ltr">On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Robert O'Callahan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:robert@ocallahan.org" target="_blank">robert@ocallahan.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><span class=""></span><span class=""></span><div>The current approach is roughly that we measure and reset the counter every time we stop and then restart the task. This isn't very clear though; we should make it clearer by removing ticks_read() and always measuring and resetting the tick counter in wait().<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br clear="all"></div></div>I just pushed a change to master that does this. Tests pass.<br><br>Rob<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">-- <br><div dir="ltr">oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo<br>owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo<br>osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo owohooo<br>osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o o‘oRoaocoao,o’o oioso<br>oaonosowoeoroaoboloeo otooo otohoeo ocooouoroto.o oAonodo oaonoyooonoeo owohooo<br>osoaoyoso,o o‘oYooouo ofooooolo!o’o owoiololo oboeo oiono odoaonogoeoro ooofo<br>otohoeo ofoioroeo ooofo ohoeololo.</div>
</div></div>