Question about rr alternative design

Robert O'Callahan robert at ocallahan.org
Tue Feb 20 20:09:25 UTC 2018


On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:30 AM, Nathan Froyd <nfroyd at mozilla.com> wrote:

> I don't know whether this alternative was considered
>

Wrapping libc calls was considered. Section 3.1 of the extended technical
report mentions it. As Nathan and Kyle said, it's simpler and more
comprehensive to intercept system calls directly rather than wrap libc
functions.

Rob
-- 
Su ot deraeppa sah dna Rehtaf eht htiw saw hcihw, efil lanrete eht uoy ot
mialcorp ew dna, ti ot yfitset dna ti nees evah ew; deraeppa efil eht. Efil
fo Drow eht gninrecnoc mialcorp ew siht - dehcuot evah sdnah ruo dna ta
dekool evah ew hcihw, seye ruo htiw nees evah ew hcihw, draeh evah ew
hcihw, gninnigeb eht morf saw hcihw taht.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rr-dev/attachments/20180221/dd17372a/attachment.html>


More information about the rr-dev mailing list