Performance Counter Addresses

Robert O'Callahan robert at ocallahan.org
Mon Oct 5 02:28:22 UTC 2015


On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Downing, Evan P <edowning3 at gatech.edu>
wrote:

> > What's PANDA's recording performance overhead?
>
>
> Recording overhead is about 1.8x
>
> Replaying overhead is about 3.6x
>
> This is according to their paper back in 2014. It may have changed since
> then.
>
>
When I read that paper, it wasn't clear what these numbers are relative to.
Are they relative to QEMU-TCG performance?

>
>
> > For that to work, your best bet is probably to use rr to record a
> Firefox session, running the whole thing under QEMU-KVM with PMU enabled.
> Then switch the QEMU mode to PANDA, and
>
> > run rr replay in it. But you would need to extend QEMU/TCG to support
> the retired-conditional-branches counter.
>
> Very interesting idea. I am interested, however, in seeing how these
> downloaded files and installed plugins possibly affect the overall
> operating system. Would the rr replay reveal this activity on the guest OS
> when replayed on top of PANDA?
>
>
<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rr-dev>No, only Firefox will be
replayed. If you want whole-OS replay then you will need to use PANDA for
recording.

Rob
-- 
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr  rdn rdsme,anea lurpr  edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf
toD
selthor  stor  edna  siewaoeodm  or v sstvr  esBa  kbvted,t
rdsme,aoreseoouoto
o l euetiuruewFa  kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr  rdm  or rnea
lurpr
.a war hsrer holsa rodvted,t  nenh hneireseoouot.tniesiewaoeivatewt sstvr
esn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rr-dev/attachments/20151005/43212989/attachment.html>


More information about the rr-dev mailing list