Suggestions on good first bugs

Robert O'Callahan robert at
Mon Nov 16 22:56:48 UTC 2015

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Daniel Näslund <dannas at> wrote:

> #1054 Implement remaining syscalls
>     Rocallahan says [3]
>     "I think we shouldn't clutter up rr with support for syscalls that
> no-one
>     ever uses in practice (e.g. because they're obsolete).

FWIW I've changed my mind about that.

I think we should at least add support for all syscalls that are obviously
'trivial", i.e. only require switching from UnsupportedSyscall to
EmulatedSyscall in because they have no relevant side-effects
(including memory writes).

lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr  rdn rdsme,anea lurpr  edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf
selthor  stor  edna  siewaoeodm  or v sstvr  esBa  kbvted,t
o l euetiuruewFa  kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr  rdm  or rnea
.a war hsrer holsa rodvted,t  nenh hneireseoouot.tniesiewaoeivatewt sstvr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the rr-dev mailing list