x86 string instructions
me at kylehuey.com
Tue Feb 24 19:38:24 PST 2015
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Chris Jones <jones.chris.g at gmail.com>
> Ugh. That hurts :/.
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Kyle Huey <me at kylehuey.com> wrote
>> The obvious alternative is to investigate using a different counter, such
>> as instructions-retired. It might even be possible to use that only in
>> this situation, using retired-conditional-branches at all other times.
> Do REP instructions bump the insns-retired counter once per iteration?
> That's almost certainly undefined, we'd want to test.
Right. Hence "investigate" :)
Obviously if they don't then that doesn't help.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rr-dev