introducing a stable branch

Robert O'Callahan robert at
Tue Apr 21 01:28:08 UTC 2015

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Chris Jones <jones.chris.g at>

> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert at>
> wrote:
>> I'm not confident enough in the stability of reverse-exec yet to release
>> rr 4.0,
> ​Just curious, what would make you confident enough?  Are there any guinea
> pigs^W^W beta testers you could recruit to speed that process up? :)

We've got a number of Mozilla devs using master (including me). I want to
go for several days of debugging without hitting rr bugs :-).

oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo
osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o o‘oRoaocoao,o’o
oaonosowoeoroaoboloeo otooo otohoeo ocooouoroto.o oAonodo oaonoyooonoeo
osoaoyoso,o o‘oYooouo ofooooolo!o’o owoiololo oboeo oiono odoaonogoeoro
otohoeo ofoioroeo ooofo ohoeololo.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the rr-dev mailing list