explicit checkpointing

Chris Jones jones.chris.g at gmail.com
Mon May 5 22:18:04 PDT 2014


On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert at ocallahan.org>wrote:

> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Chris Jones <jones.chris.g at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> and after restoring a checkpoint, we'll probably have to notify gdb of
>> all the new task statuses.  (Remember, to the gdb client it'll look like
>> the whole world changed behind its back.)
>>
>
> That part seems fine since when we restore the checkpoint via "run" gdb
> already knows the world is changing.
>
>
​Good point​, I hadn't made that connection.  Yes, sounds easy :).

Cheers,
Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rr-dev/attachments/20140505/cc7f4a82/attachment.html>


More information about the rr-dev mailing list