explicit checkpointing

Chris Jones jones.chris.g at gmail.com
Mon May 5 22:16:17 PDT 2014


On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Chris Jones <jones.chris.g at gmail.com>wrote:

>
> gdb is pretty good about managing breakpoints, so I don't expect that to
> be a problem.
>
>
​Also, rr now doesn't crap out if it fails to set breakpoints, so we don't
have to worry too much about attempts to set breakpoints on an earlier
checkpoint that hasn't yet mapped the code in question.

Cheers,
Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rr-dev/attachments/20140505/1904f429/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the rr-dev mailing list