Worst rr cruft / development taxes
jones.chris.g at gmail.com
Thu Jul 24 20:20:43 PDT 2014
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert at ocallahan.org>
> * I know you like the pattern where a private member foo is accessed via a
> getter method "foo_type& foo()" but I don't :-).
When I want to trigger side effects on setting foo, I
agree with a separate setter, but otherwise I don't like the extra
boilerplate (part of that may be Java PTSD) and sometimes like to know that
no side effects are involved. But no big deal either way, obviously.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rr-dev