Worst rr cruft / development taxes

Chris Jones jones.chris.g at gmail.com
Thu Jul 24 20:20:43 PDT 2014


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert at ocallahan.org>
wrote:

> * I know you like the pattern where a private member foo is accessed via a
> getter method "foo_type& foo()" but I don't :-).
>

When I want to trigger side effects on setting foo, I
​agree with a separate setter, but otherwise I don't like the extra
boilerplate (part of that may be Java PTSD) and sometimes like to know that
no side effects are involved.  But no big deal either way, obviously.

Cheers,
Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rr-dev/attachments/20140724/920d8660/attachment.html>


More information about the rr-dev mailing list