Cut a 1.6 release ahead of 2.0?

Robert O'Callahan robert at
Wed Aug 6 15:37:33 PDT 2014

It looks like getting rr to work properly in a VM is going to be
significant work so I agree we should push out 1.6 now and hold 2.0 on
getting rr-in-VM to work.

It's unclear how big a job the latter is. I thought I had it working
before, but possibly I just didn't test record+replay of Firefox vigorously
enough. Regardless, a lot of Mozilla people who might use rr would want to
use it in a VM so this is pretty important to me and warrants holding 2.0 I

oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo
osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o o‘oRoaocoao,o’o
oaonosowoeoroaoboloeo otooo otohoeo ocooouoroto.o oAonodo oaonoyooonoeo
osoaoyoso,o o‘oYooouo ofooooolo!o’o owoiololo oboeo oiono odoaonogoeoro
otohoeo ofoioroeo ooofo ohoeololo.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the rr-dev mailing list