RFC: rr release 0.1
jones.chris.g at gmail.com
Wed May 29 08:54:49 PDT 2013
Agreed, I want this on the roadmap too. There are a few more things I'd
like to understand better before I (at least) would be comfortable writing
* sense of performance "ceiling". This entails, at least, finishing the
syscall filter, debugging issues #9 and #10, and getting updated
* story for coverage of "execution space". This entails understanding
current scheduler limitations (issue #40 and followups), and at least
knowing how to fix then.
* story for "scalable" debugging out to the scale of firefox development.
This should be "just" engineering, hopefully.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Albert Noll <noll.albert at gmail.com> wrote:
> A publication would also help in advertising rr. Any thoughts about trying
> it again?
> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> Am 29.05.2013 um 03:34 schrieb "Robert O'Callahan" <robert at ocallahan.org>:
> > I agree. And I'm not just saying that, I always advocated doing an rr
> release at exactly the point it has enough functionality to be useful for
> someone doing something, and expected that to be once we have rudimentary
> gdb support :-).
> > Rob
> > --
> > q“qIqfq qyqoquq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qyqoquq,q
> qwqhqaqtq qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q qEqvqeqnq
> qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqeqmq.q qAqnqdq
> qiqfq qyqoquq qdqoq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qaqrqeq qgqoqoqdq
> qtqoq qyqoquq,q qwqhqaqtq qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q
> qEqvqeqnq qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq qdqoq qtqhqaqtq.q"
> > _______________________________________________
> > rr-dev mailing list
> > rr-dev at mozilla.org
> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rr-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rr-dev