<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:arial">On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:40 AM, Nancy Miller <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:purplemaizenjm@yahoo.com" target="_blank">purplemaizenjm@yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:</span><br>
</font><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div style="font-size:12pt;font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif"><div>
<span>but then I wrote to correct myself which basil did not put in <a href="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org" target="_blank">bugzilla.mozilla.org</a> <br></span></div><div><span>I am not a fool Basil so cut the crap<br></span></div>
<div><br></div> <div style="font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif;font-size:12pt"> <div style="font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif;font-size:12pt"> <div dir="ltr"> <font face="Arial"><div class="im">
<hr size="1"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold">From:</span></b> Basil Chupin <<a href="mailto:blchupin@iinet.net.au" target="_blank">blchupin@iinet.net.au</a>><br> </div><b><span style="font-weight:bold">To:</span></b> Mozilla Nightly Testers List <<a href="mailto:nightly-testers@mozilla.org" target="_blank">nightly-testers@mozilla.org</a>> <br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold">Cc:</span></b> Nancy Miller <<a href="mailto:purplemaizenjm@yahoo.com" target="_blank">purplemaizenjm@yahoo.com</a>> <br> <b><span style="font-weight:bold">Sent:</span></b> Tuesday, May 29, 2012 2:30 AM<div>
<div class="h5"><br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold">Subject:</span></b> Re: Firefox Nightly 15.0a1 and Adobe Flash 11.2.202<br> </div></div></font> </div><div><div class="h5"> <br>
<div>
<div>
<div>On 28/05/12 23:07, Nancy Miller wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div><span>It seems to me that I am giving you a direct link to
get an upgrade on your flash and your asking me to use
netiquette? Where does that come in to play when your
trying to solve a problem. I answered your question like
many others did . Macs and Linux are just about the same,
the site I have linked you to for the flashplayer also has
the update for Linux 64 bit. <br>
</span></div>
<div><br>
<span></span></div>
<div><span>If you don't want to take my advise then report your
bug to <a href="http://bugzilla.mozillza.org" target="_blank">bugzilla.mozillza.org</a><br>
</span></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<hr> <b><span>From:</span></b> Basil Chupin <a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:blchupin@iinet.net.au" target="_blank"><blchupin@iinet.net.au></a><br>
<b><span>To:</span></b> Nancy Miller <a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:purplemaizenjm@yahoo.com" target="_blank"><purplemaizenjm@yahoo.com></a>
<br>
<b><span>Sent:</span></b> Monday, May 28, 2012 3:01 AM<br>
<b><span>Subject:</span></b> Re: Firefox Nightly 15.0a1
and Adobe Flash 11.2.202<br>
</div>
<br>
<div>
<div>
<div>On 28/05/12
16:24, Nancy Miller wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div><span>shockwave and adobe flash are 2 different
things, my Shockwave Directive is 11.6.5r635 my
Flash 11.3.300.250 . The link to the flash site
is<br>
</span></div>
<div><a href="http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplatformruntimes/flashplayer11-3/" target="_blank">http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplatformruntimes/flashplayer11-3/</a></div>
<div>That is for Flashplayer 3 link. the same site
has the Shockwave Directive just click on your old
directive link and it will lead you to a new one.<br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<hr> <b><span>From:</span></b> Basil Chupin <a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:blchupin@iinet.net.au" target="_blank"><blchupin@iinet.net.au></a><br>
<b><span>To:</span></b> Nancy J Miller <a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:purplemaizenjm@yahoo.com" target="_blank"><purplemaizenjm@yahoo.com></a>
<br>
<b><span>Cc:</span></b> Bryan Price <a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:bytehead@gmail.com" target="_blank"><bytehead@gmail.com></a>;
<a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:nightly-testers@mozilla.org" target="_blank">"nightly-testers@mozilla.org"</a>
<a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:nightly-testers@mozilla.org" target="_blank"><nightly-testers@mozilla.org></a>
<br>
<b><span>Sent:</span></b> Monday, May 28, 2012
2:05 AM<br>
<b><span>Subject:</span></b> Re: Firefox
Nightly 15.0a1 and Adobe Flash 11.2.202<br>
</div>
<br>
<div>
<div>
<div>On
27/05/12 22:18, Nancy J Miller wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>Adobe flash came out with 11.3 try
that. I am using that for my computer
and it is a 64 bit<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Thank you for your response, but I do have
the very latest Flash installed on my
system. Here is a screen shot of what I see
when I do a check for latest plugins (check
done few minutes ago):<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
[............]<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div> <br>
And if you cannot see the above pic then you
can see it here:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://picpaste.com/flash-cMMcpPFR.jpg" target="_blank">http://picpaste.com/flash-cMMcpPFR.jpg</a><br>
<br>
BC<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Hi Nancy,<br>
<br>
Just a thought, but it would be most useful and helpful
if you adopted the netiquette used by most mail lists by
not top posting but replying beneath the text to which
you are responding.<br>
<br>
In answer to your comment, here is screen shot of my
file manager entry for Flash - see if this agrees with
what you are saying:<br>
<br>
<img alt="" src="cid:1.3798067411@web161001.mail.bf1.yahoo.com" height="115" width="1325"><br>
<br>
and if you cannot see the above then it is at this URL:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://picpaste.com/adobe-flash-y2y36O8v.png" target="_blank">http://picpaste.com/adobe-flash-y2y36O8v.png</a><br>
<br>
Kind regards,<br>
<br>
Basil<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
You are someone to watch out for <span><span>
:-( </span></span>.<br>
<br>
You send me a PRIVATE message.<br>
<br>
I reply to you in a PRIVATE message, but then you go and make it all
public.<br>
<br>
And then you ask where does netiquette comes into it?<br>
<br>
But just on this point of you trying to be helpful about me not
having the latest Flash, you did see my earlier post didn't you
where going to Mozilla org and checking for latest plugins I got the
response which I posted in this mail list? If not, then here it is
again:<br>
<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://picpaste.com/flash-cMMcpPFR.jpg" target="_blank">http://picpaste.com/flash-cMMcpPFR.jpg</a><br>
<br>
And as far as MAC and Linux being "about the same" is like saying
horses and mules are "about the same".<br>
<br>
BC</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div>Hi Nancy,</div><div>Basil is actually right. His analogy about Mac OS X and Linux being "about the same" is correct - while the two systems share a common root (Unix), they are distinctly different. (I say system because Linux is not technically an operating system; there are in fact many operating systems based on Linux, which is an example of a key difference from OS X.)</div>
<div>Also, it is traditionally common practice and the accepted norm to post your reply to the bottom of a list, instead of the top. Lastly, Basil undoubtedly saw your corrected link but replied to your earlier post because your link was just that - a correction. It was much easier to see what he was responding to the way he did it.</div>
</div><br>