<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Also, many of these users might be on institutional ESR
      deployments with telemetry off. So even if we had probes, they
      might not send data to us.</p>
    <p>We could reach out to the enterprise list, though.</p>
    <p>Axel<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 27.03.18 um 18:39 schrieb Alex
      Gaynor:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAGzK4uPK_ySRcn8JTaRJo_M4N=yQ8QyK8ncJhCUJS9PEEYy+3w@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>Do we have any telemetry on whether people actually use it?</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Deleting it entirely seems like the happiest course of
          action, and if there's extremely low usage that just makes it
          easier :-) Are there any reasons to want to keep it around,
          besides backwards compatibility?</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Alex<br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Boris
          Zbarsky <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bzbarsky@mit.edu"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">bzbarsky@mit.edu</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span
              class="">On 3/27/18 11:49 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote:<br>
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                What was the original intended use case for remote XUL,
                powerful origins controlled by Mozilla, or enabling
                developers to build their own powerful origins?<br>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
            </span>
            The latter.  In particular, it was used for intranet apps.<br>
            <br>
            Note that the remote XUL origins are not terribly powerful. 
            They do _not_ allow arbitrary XPCOM access, for instance... 
            They do have more attack surface than normal web pages, of
            course.
            <div class="HOEnZb">
              <div class="h5"><br>
                <br>
                -Boris<br>
                ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
                firefox-dev mailing list<br>
                <a href="mailto:firefox-dev@mozilla.org" target="_blank"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">firefox-dev@mozilla.org</a><br>
                <a href="https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/firefox-dev"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">https://mail.mozilla.org/listi<wbr>nfo/firefox-dev</a><br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
firefox-dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:firefox-dev@mozilla.org">firefox-dev@mozilla.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/firefox-dev">https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/firefox-dev</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>