<div dir="ltr">Hi Bruno,<br><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto">For someone like me who keeps many tabs opened, having a
"restore all tabs anyway" button would be very useful, so that I don't
have to search for the deselected elements to select them again.</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I do like this suggestion, and we should take it into consideration.<br></div><div><br>One thing I would suggest is to avoid showing the “restore all tabs anyway” button on every condition. Only show it if problem-causing tabs have been unchecked automatically.<br><br></div><div>Another suggestion is to float problematic tabs on top (like Gervase wrote) and somehow differentiate it from the rest of the tabs, so that it’s easy to uncheck. You’d still need to uncheck them manually, but only one “restore” button will be needed.<br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 23 February 2017 at 10:24, Brunoais <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:brunoaiss@gmail.com" target="_blank">brunoaiss@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>How about my suggestion above?<br>
Why won't anyone comment on my suggestion above?</p>
<p>If no one comments I won't be able to understand if I made a
mistake or not...<br>
</p><div><div class="h5">
<br>
<div class="m_-8512657036996045740moz-cite-prefix">On 22/02/2017 10:39, Till Schneidereit
wrote:<br>
</div>
</div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="h5">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Gijs
Kruitbosch <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gijskruitbosch@gmail.com" target="_blank">gijskruitbosch@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="m_-8512657036996045740m_-1916897508278880903moz-cite-prefix">While
we *might* be able to have a reasonable idea (and this
really isn't trivial - see Bill's message, but also
think of how we sometimes show the 'slow script'
dialog and point to the wrong code as being slow), I
think it's highly unlikely we'll ever be confident
enough to inadvertently uncheck the suspected tab
automatically, thus basically destroying user data
(including the back/forward history of that tab, form
data, cookies, scroll positions - everything) in case
we're wrong.<br>
<br>
Even if we tell the user this, that treeview is a pain
to use, and it's very likely that unchecked tabs will
be scrolled out of view in some cases. We know that
users don't read long descriptive text. So we
effectively show a page with a big highlighted button
to restore everything - and then we restore everything
except some of them, with no way for users to get
those items back. That sounds like a terrible
experience to me.<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Could we perhaps instead of showing this page at all
replace the suspect tab(s) with a "we think this page
might've caused the last crash, <click here> if you
still want to restore it" page? Perhaps combined with a
notification bar indicating that not all tabs were
restored normally.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="m_-8512657036996045740mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</div></div><span class=""><pre>______________________________<wbr>_________________
firefox-dev mailing list
<a class="m_-8512657036996045740moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:firefox-dev@mozilla.org" target="_blank">firefox-dev@mozilla.org</a>
<a class="m_-8512657036996045740moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/firefox-dev" target="_blank">https://mail.mozilla.org/<wbr>listinfo/firefox-dev</a>
</pre>
</span></blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>