<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">-relman,gofaster,mgrimes<br>
      +Selena<br>
      <br>
      On 01/10/2016 00:48, J. Ryan Stinnett wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CA+952WrE_LQUCPrQ2gP9jtsLBQCjxpKru9=w7ryf2-RoNVHuOw@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Gijs
            Kruitbosch <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:gijskruitbosch@gmail.com" target="_blank">gijskruitbosch@gmail.com</a>></span>
            wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
              0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
              rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
              <div id="gmail-:vn" class="gmail-a3s gmail-aXjCH
                gmail-m1577b542054ec998">In this specific case, it
                sounds like you're already talking to the security team.
                They would be the best people to judge if you (still)
                need a formal security review to happen on the code
                you're landing. If you haven't talked to them about
                this, now would be a good time. For other projects, a
                quick web search gets me: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security#Request_a_Security_or_Privacy_Review"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.mozilla.org/Secur<wbr>ity#Request_a_Security_or_<wbr>Privacy_Review</a>
                which seems fairly straightforward to me.<span
                  class="gmail-"></span></div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">I suppose this is the wrong venue for
          this rabbit hole,</div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    I think fx-dev is a fine venue as far as desktop product security is
    concerned. I've taken us out of the earlier thread, though.<br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CA+952WrE_LQUCPrQ2gP9jtsLBQCjxpKru9=w7ryf2-RoNVHuOw@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">but I've had a hard time contacting the
          security team in the past, so I am not sure what the right
          venue is. The wiki page above links to a security review
          request form that says "This process not currently in use,
          maintaining for historical purposes".<br>
          <br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">Is there a description of the correct
          process for requesting security review somewhere? I've
          received a lot of mixed signals about this process in the
          past, so having the right answer would be great!</div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    I hadn't noticed that. And you're right, it would be good if the
    wikipage was up-to-date (or redirected to somewhere up-to-date) and
    process here was clearer (more than "ask around to find the right
    person").<br>
    <br>
    Selena, AFAICT from phonebook you should be a good person to ask
    (please forward as necessary if I missed something) - can you help
    elucidate what would be the most current process here as far as
    gecko/desktop/mobile stuff (rather than web/ops) is concerned?<br>
    <br>
    Thanks,<br>
    Gijs<br>
  </body>
</html>