<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2015-08-17 2:49 PM, Eric Shepherd
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:55D22CAB.2020801@mozilla.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<span>»Q« wrote:</span><br>
<blockquote cite="mid:20150817130237.5db55f48@sepulchrave.remarqs"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); display:
block;">
<pre wrap=""><span class="moz-txt-citetags">> </span>My biggest problem with it is... There are a lot of rather useful
<span class="moz-txt-citetags">> </span>"abandoned" add-ons that the authors are no longer maintaining, but
<span class="moz-txt-citetags">> </span>they still work and are useful. When signing is enforced, they'll,
<span class="moz-txt-citetags">> </span>sadly, be lost.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
You can submit them to Mozilla for signing. See
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/mozilla.addons.user-experience/j_npWpkX5oA"><https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.addons.user-experience/j_npWpkX5oA></a>.</pre>
</blockquote>
Whoops. I should know better than to comment before reading to the
end. Sorry about my previous message.<br>
</blockquote>
Perhaps obviously, if the licensing terms of an abandoned addon
permit it it would be nice if they were republished publicly.<br>
<br>
- mhoye<br>
</body>
</html>