Switching to async/await from Task.jsm/yield

Mike Conley mconley at mozilla.com
Thu Mar 16 22:39:57 UTC 2017


I'm all for it.

For the people who are more familiar with async / await than I am, and
have also used Task.jsm, are there any gotchas, or is it pretty much a
drop-in replacement?

-Mike

On 2017-03-16 6:29 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
> For a long time now we've been writing JS code that waits for promises
> using Task.jsm and generator functions. Recently though the JS team
> added support for the JS standard way of doing this, async/await:
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/async_function
> 
> Writing code in standard JS is always better for the web, makes it
> easier to onboard new engineers and allows for better support in
> developer tools. So I'd like to propose that we switch to the standard
> way of writing these functions immediately. New code should use
> async/await instead of Task.jsm going forwards.
> 
> Florian has some rough plans to automatically rewrite existing usages of
> Task.jsm to the standard JS forms so for now don't worry much about
> going and submitting patches to fix up existing code. Once that is done
> we can remove Task.jsm from the tree.
> 
> Does anyone object to any of this?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> firefox-dev mailing list
> firefox-dev at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/firefox-dev
> 



More information about the firefox-dev mailing list