Intent to Implement System Add-on: SHIELD/Normandy

[Florian Weimer]

* Michael Kelly:

> What do you mean by subpeona-proof? I don't quite understand how that
> relates to your second paragraph.

The description mentioned that this is for targeted delivery of
browser tweaks.

I wonder if you perceive it as a risk that Mozilla might receive a
subpoena that orders the organization to deliver specific browser
tweaks to subsets of users.  It's not clear what is possible here.
Potential examples are deconfiguring proxy servers, changing TLS
preferences, loading additional IFRAMEs, or triggering browser
behavior which is visible even through encryption and tuneling.

I hope this explains the nature of such concerns.