Australis landing soon

Jared Wein jwein at mozilla.com
Mon Nov 18 08:33:48 PST 2013


Hi all,

I am happy to announce that we have now merged the Australis changes to the mozilla-central branch. If all goes according to plan, Australis will be present in tomorrow's nightly.

https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?rev=f2adb62d07eb

We have also merged the backout of Australis to the Holly branch. We may still want to make a branding change to Holly to make the difference clearer (suggested name is Holly), but that branding change hasn't happened yet.

https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Holly&rev=c913eeee3dfc

Cheers!
Jared

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gijs Kruitbosch" <gijskruitbosch at gmail.com>
> To: "Mike Conley" <mconley at mozilla.com>, firefox-dev at mozilla.org
> Cc: "Chris Peterson" <cpeterson at mozilla.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 9:05:20 AM
> Subject: Re: Australis landing soon
> 
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/australis-add-on-compat-draft
> 
> As the link says, this is still a draft, but several of us have looked
> it over, so this should be a decent starting point. As Justin pointed
> out elsewhere in this thread, feedback as to add-on compat has been
> limited so far, and so the organization/order of the items on this page
> might change as we become aware of new issues and/or what part(s) of
> Australis is (are) more or less of an issue for add-ons.
> 
> If you run into something that's not listed there, please do contact us
> and/or edit that page and/or file bugs.
> 
> More generally, do note that the document is explicitly meant for add-on
> authors and add-on compatibility issues discovered in testing, not for
> general issues experienced by users. We have other blog/wiki stuff in
> the works for that purpose.
> 
> Cheers,
> Gijs
> 
> On 15/11/13, 21:14 , Mike Conley wrote:
> > Hey Chris,
> >
> > That list is being constructed, and will be posted shortly (and almost
> > certainly expanded upon as we iterate on the trains).
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> > On 15/11/2013 1:00 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
> >>
> >>> We're particularly interested in add-on compatibility. Most will work
> >>> as-is. Some will need changes, often simple to make. A few will require
> >>> deeper fixes. Australis has a lot of changes, and it's difficult to
> >>> predict what assumptions a specific add-on has made
> >>
> >>
> >> Is there a list of known changes to add-on compatibility? We should
> >> probably have an "add-on developers guide to Australis" wiki page so we
> >> can document add-on issues (and fixes) as we discover them.
> >>
> >>
> >> cpeterson
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> firefox-dev mailing list
> >> firefox-dev at mozilla.org
> >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/firefox-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > firefox-dev mailing list
> > firefox-dev at mozilla.org
> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/firefox-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> firefox-dev mailing list
> firefox-dev at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/firefox-dev
> 


More information about the firefox-dev mailing list