reminder: content processes (e10s) are now used by desktop Firefox
gavin at gavinsharp.com
Fri Aug 2 01:35:58 UTC 2013
The experiment you're referring to was Adblock running in Firefox with
remote tabs enabled, I think. I'm not up to date with how that
experiment was progressing, but I think there are some fundamental
differences between that scenario and the background content processes
being used for the background thumbnailing service that might not make
the two cases directly comparable.
It would be valuable for an adblockplus developer to investigate, certainly.
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert at ocallahan.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
> <n.nethercote at gmail.com>wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Gavin Sharp <gavin at gavinsharp.com> wrote:
>> > Seems likely, I recall markh mentioning something similar - adblock
>> > doesn't work in the content process.
>> That seems... less than ideal. I don't think creeping down the e10s
>> path when all the e10s issues haven't yet been resolved is a good
> I thought AdBlock in particular we did have working with e10s. Maybe those
> changes haven't landed yet, or maybe it doesn't know about the hidden tabs
> where we load sites for thumbnailing.
> Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni
> le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa
> stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
> 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp
> waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w *
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform at lists.mozilla.org
More information about the firefox-dev