Another de-facto insecurity we need to fix in ES5
P T Withington
ptw at pobox.com
Thu Jun 18 09:50:30 PDT 2009
The language regarding [[Extensible]] and the mutability of
[[Prototype]] was clear. My question was really off-topic and I
apologize for not saying so.
OTOH, the answer is puzzling to me. I would have expected the
opposite. A non-extensible object with an extensible prototype seems
like a lot of rope to leave laying around...
On 2009-06-18, at 12:31EDT, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
> Like Mark said, no.
> Was this a question of intent or did you find my proposed language
> unclear in this regard. If the latter, what part of it did you find
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: P T Withington [mailto:ptwithy at gmail.com] On Behalf Of P T
>> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 9:23 AM
>> To: Allen Wirfs-Brock
>> Cc: Brendan Eich; Mark S. Miller; es5-discuss at mozilla.org; es-discuss
>> Subject: Re: Another de-facto insecurity we need to fix in ES5
>> Does making an object not extensible imply/require than the object's
>> prototype is also not extensible?
More information about the es5-discuss