Since JSDoc seems cerebrally dead...

#!/JoePea joe at trusktr.io
Mon Oct 12 20:23:10 UTC 2020


Why not? People are generating less docs now? That doesn't sound good!

#!/JoePea

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 4:15 PM Isiah Meadows <contact at isiahmeadows.com> wrote:
>
> JSDoc is not dead (far from it), people just don't frequently use
> automated docs generation tooling in the JS community. Most the actual
> use JSDoc provides nowadays is editor autocomplete hints and
> integrating with TypeScript (in cases where changing the extension
> isn't possible for whatever reason), so while it's still useful, it's
> just not used in the same places it was used previously.
>
> -----
>
> Isiah Meadows
> contact at isiahmeadows.com
> www.isiahmeadows.com
>
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 6:39 PM Michaël Rouges <michael.rouges at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Since JSDoc seems cerebrally dead, why the TC39 doesn't make a real documentation standard, evolving with the langage?
> >
> > Actually, a part of  the JS community are exiling to TS to type anything and the rest are just despited by the very outdated version of JSDoc but don't want to add TS to their stack.
> >
> > IMHO, it's really urgent to have something formal to solve that missing point of my favorite language.
> >
> > What would it take to make this dream come true, please?
> >
> >
> > Michaël Rouges - https://github.com/Lcfvs - @Lcfvs
> > _______________________________________________
> > es-discuss mailing list
> > es-discuss at mozilla.org
> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss


More information about the es-discuss mailing list