Ternary operator enhancement proposal

Jacob Pratt jhprattdev at gmail.com
Wed Nov 13 02:46:16 UTC 2019

Aside from the fact that using a non-reserved identifier would break
back-compatibility, I'm fairly certain pattern matching would allow for not
recalculating the value while also being far more readable.

On Tue, Nov 12, 2019, 21:43 devlato <ecma6 at devlato.com> wrote:

> Hey folks,
> not sure if you haven't discussed something similar, but what do you think
> about making an enhancement for the ternary operator, to make it more
> powerful?
> I've created a small explanatory doc on GitHub:
> https://github.com/devlato/proposal-ternary-placeholder
> Warmest regards,
> Denis
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20191112/0d28cc31/attachment.html>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list