Optional Curly Braces in JavaScript

Jordan Harband ljharb at gmail.com
Sat Nov 2 21:47:55 UTC 2019

My preference would be to make them required in the places they're
currently optional :-)

Optional curly braces have led to many bugs, not just in JS (the "goto
fail" SSL bug, for example) - why is this risk worth making it easier to
write code on a whiteboard, where it doesn't need to be valid anyways?

On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 12:39 PM Bergi <a.d.bergi at web.de> wrote:

> Hello Ed!
> > That would make JavaScript an easy to write on board language, where a
> language like python dominates because of it's simplicity in writing. This
> would make JavaScript spread into more areas in science, education and
> engineering.
> You seem to not only want to make block syntax optional, but rather make
> whitespace indentation significant. You might want to have a look at
> CoffeeScript <http://coffeescript.org/#language> which is a
> compile-to-JS language that uses this concept. Its function syntax is a
> bit different from what you imagined though, most importantly it doesn't
> offer any declarations.
> kind regards,
>  Bergi
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20191102/bb332420/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list