Proposal: Chainable do sugar

Michael Luder-Rosefield rosyatrandom at gmail.com
Fri Jan 18 05:32:52 UTC 2019


It's OK, you can say the m-word here. Monad. See? Nothing bad wi--

-TRANSMISSION LOST

On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 11:03 Paul Gray <pfbgray at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello friends!
>
> I’d love to discuss the potential for syntax sugar around a popular fp
> pattern, *chainables*!
>
> I’ve written up a document here
> <https://github.com/pfgray/ecma-proposal-chainable-do-syntax> with the
> details.
>
> I’ve also written a small Babel plugin that implements this. Here’s a
> codesandbox <https://codesandbox.io/s/4qkl21666w> with it loaded up.
>
> Thanks for your time!
>
> - Paul Gray
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20190118/949e4027/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list