Proposal: strict built-in functions
Mark S. Miller
erights at gmail.com
Tue Dec 10 03:07:32 UTC 2019
Thanks Claude, I agree. I have added it to the agenda as well.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 12:45 AM Claude Pache <claude.pache at gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 8 déc. 2019 à 15:39, Mark S. Miller <erights at gmail.com> a écrit :
> Wow, Edge is definitely in violation of the intent of the spec, and the
> intent of the history of treatments of .caller in previous discussions and
> specs over the years. The Edge behavior is grossly unsafe.
> Hi Jack, thanks for catching this and raising it!! It does need to be
> fixed. I do think it can be a PR because the historical intent was clear.
> Since the FF behavior is correct, the correct behavior is web compat, so we
> should be able to handle this in a PR.
> Whether a PR or a full proposal, in either case I'm happy to take this to
> the committee. I invested years of my life killing non-sloppy
> function.caller. I can spend a little more ;)
> Hi Mark,
> I think it is time to revive https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/562 and
> its associated repo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss