Michael J. Ryan
tracker1 at gmail.com
Sat Sep 22 07:42:13 UTC 2018
Considering how many js devs fail to answer "what values evaluate to false
There's a combination of problems. People believing they're better
developers than they are. People who look down on js and front end
development. And those ahead to learn new things.
JS isn't really evolving any more than Java, C#, go, python and others as a
whole in the past 20 years. And having to fight uphill to use newer
features is a pain. I'm not on the younger side of this (I'm 42)... But
I've managed to keep up.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018, 17:14 kai zhu <kaizhu256 at gmail.com> wrote:
> a problem i've observed in industry is that many es6 language-features
> have the unintended-consequence of incentivising incompetent
> difficult for many employers (even those knowledgeable in general-purpose
> programming), to discern between:
> ship products (albeit with legitimate delays), and
> b) an incompetent-one who can easily hide themselves in non-productive es6
> busywork, and continually pushback product-integration (again with
> “legitimate” delays, until its too late).
> its gotten bad enough that many industry-employers no longer trust
> general-purpose-programming technical-interviews when recruiting js-devs,
> and rely almost exclusively on either a) an applicant's reputation /
> word-of-mouth for getting things done, or b) their ability to complete a
> time-consuming tech-challenge, where they must demonstrate ability to ship
> a mini-product. both methods are not scalable to meet the demand in
> industry for qualified js-devs in product-development.
> the only solution i can think of to this industry-problem is to hold-back
> style-guides and existing design-patterns proven to work (more is less);
> generally, ways to enhance the current, woefully inadequate “bullsh*t
> detector” of employers so they can better identify and
> mentor/train/weed-out unqualified js-devs.
> kai zhu
> kaizhu256 at gmail.com
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss