Expectations around line ending behavior for U+2028 and U+2029
cabo at tzi.org
Mon Oct 29 21:33:34 UTC 2018
On Oct 29, 2018, at 21:55, J Decker <d3ck0r at gmail.com> wrote:
Your message was non-surprising to me: Most editors indeed do not heed the Unicode lore on 2028 and 2029, as nobody uses these characters in plaintext.
I was interested in learning about ones that do implement 2028 and 2029 as intended by Unicode; Claude had four of them, and I would like to meet them.
More information about the es-discuss