FW: Proposal: safeEval

[doodad-js Admin]

For the last time, why do you believe opcode filtering can?

 

Because, at my knowledge, AST filtering is more subject to break than “opcode” filtering. If that’s not the case, please help me to provide a better “safeEval” by reporting issues of my library directly to me. But I doubt it can be full proof without runtime’s help.

 

Claude

 

 

From: Mike Samuel <mikesamuel at gmail.com> 
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 6:53 PM
To: doodad-js Admin <doodadjs at gmail.com>
Cc: Isiah Meadows <isiahmeadows at gmail.com>; es-discuss <es-discuss at mozilla.org>
Subject: Re: FW: Proposal: safeEval

 

 

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018, 6:51 PM doodad-js Admin <doodadjs at gmail.com <mailto:doodadjs at gmail.com> > wrote:

This is silly.  I can want these without wanting them built using substandard tools.

 

That’s the point why I bring it to ES. Nothing on the “user land” can provide something reliable, apart a complete JS runtime library compiled to “WASM” or “asm.js”. And... that’s silly.

 

For the last time, why do you believe opcode filtering can?

 



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20180622/a9767a5d/attachment.html>